This studio photo from the 1890s shows a couple in beachwear. Note that the woman is wearing stockings. |
Ironically, the clothing of poor and working-class women was probably more comfortable in the heat than that of middle- and upper-class women. The latter were required, for appearance's sake, to don various foundation garments, then finish them off with frocks fitted out with stays, buttons and hooks. The fancier the occasion, the more elaborate--and probably more uncomfortable--the dress.
Underneath their frocks, fashionable women of the time wore a number of foundation garments. They did not use modern bras and underpants, but rather chemises and bloomers topped with corsets or cinch belts. Over these went petticoats, garter belts, and stockings.
An illustration of a corset from an 1890 catalog. |
Cinching up the fashion victim to produce such an effect was often quite a chore, involving much pulling and straining on the corset strings. Once the lady had the corset on, she had to be careful not to eat or exert herself too much for fear of fainting. This crazy practice of midriff-squeezing frequently caused not only discomfort, but serious internal injury.
Much has been made of the difficulties in undressing Victorian women for sexual liaisons. Bodice-ripping, however, would have been for naught, as the man would have discovered much more fabric and hardware underneath.
In the 1880s bustles were all the rage, with short trains. Around 1890 the bustle started to shrink, eventually disappearing by the turn of the century. The bustle was replaced by burgeoning sleeve sizes. By 1895 the huge leg-o-mutton sleeve had become standard on bodices, even for daily wear. These puffy, gigantic upper sleeves stayed in vogue into the 20th century.
Images of 1890 evening attire: A black silk and pink velvet jet-beaded bodice and skirt sold on Ebay in May for $150. The back of the dress isn't shown, but it is likely that there is no bustle. |
It wasn't until the Roaring 'Twenties that women were liberated from constrictive garments. We can thank the Flapper, with her short bob, raised hemline, and natural waistline, for setting the fashion trends of the 20th century. It should come as no surprise that the Nineteenth Amendment to the Constitution, the amendment that gave women the vote, was ratified in 1920.*
Women today have a choice over whether they become fashion victims or not. One hundred years ago, they did not.
1920's Flappers living dangerously on the roof of a New York skyscraper. |
A google search brought me here while researching what a young lady would have worn in lieu of a bra during 1889. Love your photos and your book sounds very interesting; I'm going to look for it. :)
ReplyDeleteMelyssa (shadowsgray.com)
Your portrayal of corsets isn't accurate.
ReplyDeleteTight lacing, which is what you are describing, was rare and short lived. The hour glass shape and small waist was made by padding out the bust and hips and bum with padding.
The corset was a support for posture, it smoothed out curves and all the pudge that we ourselves don't like, but also it was the support for all the heavy skirts and petticoats that would be digging painfully into the waist and hips otherwise.
There are a lot of women on You Tube who have shown themselves wearing these corsets doing everyday things like housework, running, playing, etc. Corsets were no worse on the body then modern bras. Just different.
Men didn't like that women artificially changed their shape so much so they started the false campaign about fainting and broken ribs. Fainting was rare, and usually not because of tight lacing as that was equally rare (think about how rare severe eating disorders are now, and it was just as warned against and frowned upon by broader society). Broken ribs was a reference to the wear and year that would cause the boning to break on corsets that weren't boned with steele.
Corsets are comfortable (if fitted correctly, with a shift under it) and not at all dangerous if worn properly.
Thanks for the information.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete